Sociometric Statuses of Children in Different Schooling Systems in Thane: A Thematic Analysis

Authors

  • Komal M. Kadam Assistant Professor and Head Kirti M. Doongursee College (Autonomous) Dadar (W), Mumbai
  • Disha Poojary Department of Psychology, Kirti M. Doongursee College (Autonomous) Dadar (W), Mumbai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53032/tvcr/2025.v7n2.14

Keywords:

Socio-metric statuses, Students wellbeing, Private Schools, Government Schools, Social Development, Metro cities, Thane-Dombivali, Thematic Analysis

Abstract

Childhood plays a critical role in shaping personality and lifestyle, with differing socio-metric statuses (Popular, Average, Controversial, Neglected, and Rejected) forming primarily during school years. Previous research shows that rejected and neglected children face challenges not only in school but also in future relationships and workplaces. This study aims to explore how family, friends, and the academic environment influence socio-metric status and later affect students’ self-esteem, participation in activities, and societal views. Using an exploratory design, this study collected data of 40 students aged 5-14 years using open-ended interviews. Data was then analysed using ATLAS.ti software and thematic analysis was done. Many themes were identified that contributed to the development of the rejected/neglected socio-metric styles. Among students from Private school the family related problems are significant whereas among Government school children both the family and school environment factors seem to be significant. Private & Government school students show different patterns of impact on social behaviour. Overall the study identifies the need to have different plans to tackle the issues of being Neglected and Rejected differently according to children’s unique environment. This study contributes to efforts of promoting the well-being of the student by highlighting the importance of the sociometric statuses and its effect on social development. The result of the study can be used by various educational institutes to revise the policies and provide a better environment for the students.

References

Thornton, S. (2007). The rejected child. 2007(25), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.12968/FTSE.2007.6.1.22913

Jonson-Reid, M., Drake, B., & Zhou, P. (2013). Neglect subtypes, race, and poverty: individual, family, and service characteristics. Child Maltreatment, 18(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559512462452

Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The Academic Lives of Neglected, Rejected, Popular, and Controversial Children. Child Development, 66(3), 754–763. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131948

Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Brakke, N. P. (1982). Behavior patterns of socially rejected and neglected preadolescents: the roles of social approach and aggression. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 10(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00912329

van der Wilt F, van der Veen C, van Kruistum C, van Oers B. (2018). Popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, or average: Do young children of different sociometric groups differ in their level of oral communicative competence?. Social Development. 27: 793–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12316

Sandstrom, M.J., Cillessen, A.H.N. and Eisenhower, A. (2003), Children's Appraisal of Peer Rejection Experiences: Impact on Social and Emotional Adjustment. Social Development, 12: 530-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00247

van der Wilt F, van der Veen C, van Kruistum C, van Oers B. (2019). Why Do Children Become Rejected by Their Peers? A Review of Studies into the Relationship Between Oral Communicative Competence and Sociometric Status in Childhood. Educ Psychol Rev 31, 699–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09479-z

Patwardhan, M., Li, SJ., Miles, T. et al (2023). Types of health service utilization in Mumbai slums: a community-based survey. BMC Res Notes 16, 289. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06557-y

Subham Roy, Suranjan Majumder, Arghadeep Bose, Indrajit Roy Chowdhury, (2024). The rich-poor divide: Unravelling the spatial complexities and determinants of wealth inequality in India, Applied Geography, Volume 166, 103267, ISSN 0143-6228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103267.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Komal M. Kadam, & Disha Poojary. (2025). Sociometric Statuses of Children in Different Schooling Systems in Thane: A Thematic Analysis. The Voice of Creative Research, 7(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.53032/tvcr/2025.v7n2.14