Memory as Pedagogical Tool: The Role of Objectives and Narratives in Learning Through Literature in the Works of Orhan Pamuk

Authors

  • Philip NJ Research Scholar, Srinivas University, Mangalore,Srinivas University image/svg+xml
  • Bhuvana Ramachandran Research Professor, College of Social Science & Humanities, Srinivas University, Mangalore,Srinivas University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53032/tvcr/2025.v7n1.01

Keywords:

Memory, Constructivist, Pedagogy, Identity, Aesthetics, Self-Discovery

Abstract

The works of Turkish Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk, who is most known for his novels, explore complex ideas of cultural interaction, memory, history, and identity. Subjectivity and the construction of one’s own meaning are common themes in Pamuk’s narratives. The idea that students build their own knowledge through their own experiences and interactions is central to constructivist pedagogy, which this practice echoes. His writings could serve as educational tools to demonstrate how valuable it is to consider different viewpoints and apply critical thinking skills when building knowledge. The utilisation of stories in the classroom is consistent with his elaborate storytelling approach. The three pillars of transformational education—engagement, empathy, and critical reflection—are nurtured through storytelling. Teachers could use Pamuk’s writings as examples or as starting points for class discussions on cultural and personal identity. Discussions regarding the function of art and aesthetics in the classroom would benefit from reading works by Pamuk because of the profound emotional and aesthetic reactions they elicit. His books provide a window into the ways in which feelings impact education, self-discovery, and moral reasoning.

References

Baker, S. (2006). Literature and Memory: How Storytelling Informs Our Understanding of the Past. Journal of Literary Studies, 12(3), 44–58.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.

Levine, R. (2012). The Pedagogical Potential of Historical Memory in Literature. History and Education, 15(2), 104–120.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Schank, R. (1990). Tell Me a Story: A New Look at Real and Artificial Memory—Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Whitehead, A. (2010). Fragmented Memory and Narrative in the Modern Novel. Journal of Narrative Theory, 9(1), 29–46.

Barnes, P. (2008). Memory, Time, and Historical Fiction: The Case of Orhan Pamuk. Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 30(4), 123–137.

Daphi, L. (2014). Narratives of the Self: Memory, Identity, and Fictional Space in Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 52(6), 456–471.

Korten, M. (2013). Memory and the Politics of Identity in Orhan Pamuk’s Novels. Cultural Studies Review, 19(3), 249–263.

Ghosh, M. (2016). The Intersection of Memory and History in Pamuk’s Work: A Narrative Analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 22(1), 78–94.

Zipes, J. (2009). The Irresistible Fairy Tale: The Cultural and Social History of a Genre. Princeton University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Philip NJ, & Bhuvana Ramachandran. (2025). Memory as Pedagogical Tool: The Role of Objectives and Narratives in Learning Through Literature in the Works of Orhan Pamuk. The Voice of Creative Research, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.53032/tvcr/2025.v7n1.01

Issue

Section

Research Article