The Constitution of India as an Instrument of Social Transformation: Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and the Judicial Pursuit of Social Justice
Keywords:
Transformative constitutionalism, Social justice, Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy, Article 21, Basic structure, Gender justiceAbstract
The Constitution of India was framed for a society fractured by caste hierarchy, gender subordination, religious division and mass poverty. Its framers therefore designed it not merely to distribute governmental power but to reorder social relations. This article examines how the Constitution performs that transformative function. It analyses the social vision of the Constituent Assembly, the egalitarian and horizontally applicable guarantees of Part III, the welfare mandate of the Directive Principles in Part IV, and the role of the Supreme Court in harmonising the two Parts and expanding Article 21 into a reservoir of socio-economic entitlements. It further considers gender justice, protective discrimination, disability rights, minority safeguards and universal adult franchise as concrete channels of social change, and draws on Kerala's experience of land reform and democratic decentralisation as a sub-national illustration of the Directive Principles at work. The article argues that the Indian Constitution is best understood as a transformative charter whose promise depends on three conditions: legislative implementation of the Directive Principles, principled and restrained judicial creativity, and a constitutional culture that promote fraternity. It concludes by identifying the persisting gap between constitutional text and social reality and suggesting measures to narrow it.
References
Notes
Granville Austin, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation 50 (Oxford Univ. Press 1966).
See generally M.P. Jain, Indian Constitutional Law (8th ed., LexisNexis 2018); H.M. Seervai, Constitutional Law of India (4th ed., Universal Law Publishing 1991–96).
Karl E. Klare, Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism, 14 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 146, 150 (1998).
James Bryce, Studies in History and Jurisprudence, vol. I (Oxford, Clarendon Press 1901).
Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, pt. II (1792).
Aristotle, Politics, bk. IV.
See Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union, (1997) 9 SCC 377; D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis).
Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (Oxford Univ. Press 1999).
Klare, supra note 3; Gautam Bhatia, The Transformative Constitution: A Radical Biography in Nine Acts (HarperCollins India 2019).
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1.
Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39; Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, (2019) 11 SCC 1.
In re Berubari Union, AIR 1960 SC 845.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225 : AIR 1973 SC 1461.
Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 2.
Excel Wear v. Union of India, (1978) 4 SCC 224; D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, (1983) 1 SCC 305.
Report of the Committee Appointed by the All Parties Conference (Nehru Report) (1928); Resolution on Fundamental Rights and Economic Programme, Indian National Congress, Karachi Session (1931). See Austin, supra note 1, ch. 3.
Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. I, 13 Dec. 1946 (Objectives Resolution moved by Jawaharlal Nehru); vol. II, 22 Jan. 1947 (adoption).
B. Shiva Rao, The Framing of India's Constitution: A Study (Indian Institute of Public Administration 1968); Austin, supra note 1.
Constitution of Ireland, 1937, art. 45 (Directive Principles of Social Policy); see Austin, supra note 1, ch. 4.
Austin, supra note 1; Basu, supra note 7.
Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. VII, 19 Nov. 1948.
Id. at 494–95 (speech of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar).
Id. (speech of Mahavir Tyagi).
Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. XI, 25 Nov. 1949 (speech of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar).
INDIA CONST. art. 17; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, No. 22 of 1955.
State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan, AIR 1951 SC 226; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951.
State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas, (1976) 2 SCC 310.
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 Supp (3) SCC 217.
Constitution (Ninety-third Amendment) Act, 2005 (art. 15(5)); Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 (arts. 15(6), 16(6)); Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust v. Union of India, (2014) 8 SCC 1.
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1974) 4 SCC 3; Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248.
Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002; Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, No. 35 of 2009.
Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India, (2012) 6 SCC 1.
People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235.
INDIA CONST. arts. 25–30; T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 8 SCC 481.
Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. VII, 9 Dec. 1948 (speech of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar).
INDIA CONST. art. 37.
INDIA CONST. art. 38; clause (2) was inserted by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978.
Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, which also inserted arts. 39A, 43A and 48A.
Art. 45 was substituted by the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights art. 2(1), Dec. 16, 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3.
Frank I. Michelman, The Constitution, Social Rights, and Liberal Political Justification, 1 Int'l J. Const. L. 13 (2003).
Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Equal Remuneration Act, 1976; both now subsumed in the Code on Wages, 2019, No. 29 of 2019.
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987; Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005; Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009; National Food Security Act, 2013.
Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992.
Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (Act 1 of 1964).
Kesavananda Bharati, supra note 13.
Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994; Kerala Municipality Act, 1994; see T.M. Thomas Isaac & Richard W. Franke, Local Democracy and Development: The Kerala People's Campaign for Decentralized Planning (LeftWord Books 2000).
Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 (inserting Part IVA); Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002 (inserting art. 51A(k)).
AIIMS Students' Union v. AIIMS, (2002) 1 SCC 428.
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, (1985) 2 SCC 556; Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, (1995) 3 SCC 635.
Uniform civil code .Article 44.
Champakam Dorairajan, supra note 26.
I.C. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, AIR 1967 SC 1643.
Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971; Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act, 1971.
Kesavananda Bharati, supra note 13.
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain, 1975 Supp SCC 1; Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, (1980) 3 SCC 625; S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, (1994) 3 SCC 1; L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, (1997) 3 SCC 261; M. Nagaraj v. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 212.
Minerva Mills, supra note 57.
Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1993) 1 SCC 645.
State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara, AIR 1951 SC 318; Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of Jammu & Kashmir, (1980) 4 SCC 1.
State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, (2005) 8 SCC 534.
State of Karnataka v. Ranganatha Reddy, (1977) 4 SCC 471; Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Co. v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (1983) 1 SCC 147.
Property Owners Association v. State of Maharashtra, Civil Appeal No. 1012 of 2002 (S.C., decided 5 Nov. 2020)
Maneka Gandhi, supra note 31.
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi, (1981) 1 SCC 608.
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, (1985) 3 SCC 545.
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, (1984) 3 SCC 161.
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, (1991) 1 SCC 598.
Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal, (1996) 4 SCC 37.
Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, (1980) 1 SCC 81.
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, (1992) 3 SCC 666; Unni Krishnan, supra note 59.
People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 196 of 2001 (S.C.), interim orders including the order of 28 Nov. 2001.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1987) 1 SCC 395; Rylands v. Fletcher, (1868) LR 3 HL 330.
Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum v. Union of India, (1996) 5 SCC 647.
M.K. Ranjitsinh v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 838 of 2019 (S.C., decided 21 Mar. 2024).
S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, 1981 Supp SCC 87; Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, (1980) 3 SCC 488.
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 SCC 241.
Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, No. 14 of 2013.
Shayara Bano, supra note 30; Joseph Shine, supra note 11; Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, (2020) 7 SCC 469.
INDIA CONST. arts. 243D, 243T; Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, (inserting arts. 330A, 332A and 334A).
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438.
INDIA CONST. arts. 46, 244, 330, 332; Fifth and Sixth Schedules.
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, No. 33 of 1989.
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, No. 49 of 2016.
Vikash Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission, (2021) 5 SCC 370.
Jeeja Ghosh v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 761.
See Austin, supra note 1, ch. 3.
Government of India Act, 1935, 26 Geo. 5, c. 2, Sixth Schedule.
Ornit Shani, How India Became Democratic: Citizenship and the Making of the Universal Franchise (Cambridge Univ. Press 2018).
Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013, No. 25 of 2013; Safai Karamchari Andolan v. Union of India, (2014) 11 SCC 224.
Upendra Baxi, Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India, 4 Third World Legal Stud. 107 (1985).
Anuj Bhuwania, Courting the People: Public Interest Litigation in Post-Emergency India (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017); Pratap Bhanu Mehta, The Rise of Judicial Sovereignty, 18 J. Democracy 70 (2007); see, e.g., Almitra H. Patel v. Union of India, (2000) 2 SCC 679.
Indra Sawhney, supra note 28; Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta, (2018) 10 SCC 396.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (Aadhaar), (2019) 1 SCC 1.
Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. XI, supra note 24.
Id.
Bibliography
Primary sources. The Constitution of India; Constituent Assembly Debates, vols. I, II, VII and XI (Lok Sabha Secretariat); Government of India Act, 1935; the statutes and constitutional amendments cited in the Notes.
Books. Austin, Granville, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation (Oxford Univ. Press 1966); Basu, D.D., Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis); Bhatia, Gautam, The Transformative Constitution (HarperCollins India 2019); Bhuwania, Anuj, Courting the People (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017); Jain, M.P., Indian Constitutional Law (8th ed., LexisNexis 2018); Seervai, H.M., Constitutional Law of India (4th ed., Universal Law Publishing 1991–96); Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom (Oxford Univ. Press 1999); Shani, Ornit, How India Became Democratic (Cambridge Univ. Press 2018); Shiva Rao, B., The Framing of India's Constitution: A Study (Indian Institute of Public Administration 1968); Thomas Isaac, T.M. & Franke, Richard W., Local Democracy and Development (LeftWord Books 2000).
Articles. Baxi, Upendra, Taking Suffering Seriously, 4 Third World Legal Stud. 107 (1985); Klare, Karl E., Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism, 14 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 146 (1998); Mehta, Pratap Bhanu, The Rise of Judicial Sovereignty, 18 J. Democracy 70 (2007); Michelman, Frank I., The Constitution, Social Rights, and Liberal Political Justification, 1 Int'l J. Const. L. 13 (2003).
International instrument. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966....
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Voice of Creative Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
