A Knowledge-Based Framework for ESG Adoption in SMEs: The Roles of Stakeholder Engagement and Market Dynamism
Keywords:
SMEs, stakeholder engagement, absorptive capacity, ESGAbstract
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often face pressure to adopt sustainability-oriented practices aligned with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) expectations. Their limited financial and managerial resources restrict the effective implementation of ESG practices. This study proposes a conceptual framework to explain how SMEs convert stakeholder relationships into sustainability-oriented practices through knowledge-related. Building on insights from the knowledge-based view and stakeholder theory, the study proposes that stakeholder engagement enables firms to access sustainability-related knowledge from external actors. This interaction facilitates knowledge acquisition, which supports the development of absorptive capacity, leading to better firm-level ESG practices. The framework further proposes that market dynamism moderates the relationship between knowledge acquisition and absorptive capacity, such that the conversion of acquired knowledge into organizational capabilities becomes stronger in dynamic market environments. By linking stakeholder engagement with knowledge-based mechanisms, this study contributes to the growing literature on sustainability in SMEs. It also explains how SMEs can use stakeholder relationships to develop ESG-oriented practices.
References
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1102.
Jenkins, H. (2009). A ‘business opportunity’ model of corporate social responsibility for small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 21–36.
Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 45–62.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Voice of Creative Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
